Username:
Password:
Remember Me?
   Lost your password?
Search
 Search 

On site at Ubisoft Montreal

Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience

Author: Kristoffer Keipp (Sep 30, 2008) - We just came back from a short trip to Montreal where we visited Ubisoft and took a closer look at their latest action game Far Cry 2.
DX10, 1.680 x 1.050, 4x FSAA, maximal details: In some areas like cities for example you have to respect ceasefire agreements. (picture: PCGH)
DX10, 1.680 x 1.050, 4x FSAA, maximal details: In some areas like cities for example you have to respect ceasefire agreements. (picture: PCGH)
Ubisoft had two systems prepared for us. Below you can see the components we could identify:

System 1 (DX9)
CPU: Core 2 Quad QX6700
GPU 2x Geforce 8800 Ultra
RAM: 2,5 GiByte
Chipset: Nforce 780i SLI or 680i SLI
OS: Windows XP SP2

System 2 (DX10)
CPU: Core 2 Quad QX9650
GPU: Geforce GTX 280
RAM: 4 GiByte
OS: Windows Vista 32 Bit

With one of the two systems we started a new game and played the story. Right from the start we are impressed by the atmosphere that really makes us feel like we were on the African continent. This is supported by the coherent visualization: the vegetation, objects and characters fit into the scenario. Nothing looks like its fresh from the factory, but most things are dirty and dusted.

DX9, 1.680 x 1.050, no FSAA: Fire can be a useful tool but it is dangerous for the player, too. (picture: PCGH)
DX9, 1.680 x 1.050, no FSAA: Fire can be a useful tool but it is dangerous for the player, too. (picture: PCGH)
While playing, we noticed that Far Cry 2 uses up to 60 percent of the CPU capacity in some situations. This is remarkable since those values are reached on the high-end device QX9650. The two programmers of Ubisoft, whom we interviewed, told us that a quad-core CPU would deliver 30 percent better performance on average than an identical dual-core processor. The RAM usage is about 600 Megabyte – even after a long time playing on Windows Vista (32 Bit). On the first test system Far Cry 2 was running smoothly at 1,680 x 1,050 with high details and activated HDR and Bloom. In regards of the graphics settings we noticed, that the framerate increased a lot when we set the details from Very High to High. In combination with the information we got during our technical interview, we therefore assume that Far Cry 2 will, with adjusted settings, run quite good even on weak systems. When comparing DX 10 and DX9 we noticed that in DX10 the shadows were a bit softer and did flicker a lot less. The programmers confirmed our observation. Furthermore the water effects are said to look better in DX10.

DX9, 1.680 x 1.050, no FSAA: One of the vehicles in Far Cry 2. (picture: PCGH)
DX9, 1.680 x 1.050, no FSAA: One of the vehicles in Far Cry 2. (picture: PCGH)
In our personal opinion, and here our editors Daniel and Kristoffer agree, it’s the atmosphere of Far Cry 2 that, in addition to the visual quality, will possibly make the game very successful. The possibility to follow the story related missions or do some side quests, always offers interesting alternatives for you to choose.




Bookmark this story: del.icio.us Google Linkarena Mister Wong oneview YiGG Webnews Digg Shortnews ...

Advertisement
Most popular graphics cards*
*Statistics by Futuremark ORB

Comments (20)

Comments 10 to 20  Read all comments here!
pcghx_Kristoffer Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Administrator
20.10.2008 12:59
Quote: (Originally Posted by CpuGuy)
AMD has already released a hotfix just for Far Cry 2 so IMO it should be very friendly for CF/or 4800 series video card.


We are currently running benchmarks with this hotfix driver. Results will follow soon.
CpuGuy Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Junior Member
18.10.2008 20:16
Quote: (Originally Posted by imstreet)
Thats right, other thing im afraid...
i really hope Far Cry 2 isnt "nvidia friendly" like crysis\crysis warhead.

Im thinking in buying an 4780 1gb card (single gpu) just to play Far Cry 2 without problems.


AMD has already released a hotfix just for Far Cry 2 so IMO it should be very friendly for CF/or 4800 series video card.
CpuGuy Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Junior Member
18.10.2008 20:14
Quote: (Originally Posted by pcghx_Kristoffer)
Well in some extent you could compare Far Cry 2 with Stalker, but we cannot say too much about the story line, since we only scratched it on the surface in the limited time we had. As far as we saw it, you can choose to follow the main story or do side quests at your own free will. We also drove around without a certain aim in mind and explored the game a bit. So it seems like you will have a lot of possibilities when choosing what to do next.

As far as the atmosphere is concerned, I have to say that in my personal (totally biased) opinion, that Far Cry 2 is absolutely stunning. I can’t compare it to Stalker right now, since it has been quite some time since I played Stalker for the last time and my impressions of Far Cry 2 are still fresh, so it wouldn't be fair or objective. But I think Far Cry 2 is one of the most atmospheric games I have got my hands on for quite some time.



The two Ultras were able to run Very High without problems at 1.680 x 1.050.



That's system RAM. We didn't have a chance to check on the video memory.


Vs Crysis is Far Cry 2 (PC version) on par visually?
imstreet Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Junior Member
12.10.2008 19:40
Quote: (Originally Posted by Ar.Pi)
Yeah, I know. I wanted to add that Crysis scales very bad!

But except the fact that the first Far Cry was developed by Crytek, Crysis and Far Cry 2 has nothing in common (which is a good thing - performance-wise ). It uses Dunia engine.

Check out COD4 & HL2 scale, on higher resolutions these games scale almost twice.


Thats right, other thing im afraid...
i really hope Far Cry 2 isnt "nvidia friendly" like crysis\crysis warhead.

Im thinking in buying an 4780 1gb card (single gpu) just to play Far Cry 2 without problems.
Ar.Pi Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Senior Member
12.10.2008 19:37
Quote: (Originally Posted by imstreet)
Well my 3870x2 1gb card doesnt scale well on crysis, and crysis warhead.
Hope Far Cry 2 is different.


Yeah, I know. I wanted to add that Crysis scales very bad!

But except the fact that the first Far Cry was developed by Crytek, Crysis and Far Cry 2 has nothing in common (which is a good thing - performance-wise ). It uses Dunia engine.

Check out COD4 & HL2 scale, on higher resolutions these games scale almost twice.
imstreet Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Junior Member
12.10.2008 12:58
Quote: (Originally Posted by Ar.Pi)
I'm almost sure it will. Most games do.

The question is how well it will scale. And that depends on drivers also.

I know nvidia is working closely with developers so they have better SLI support for new games, but ATI is catching up (also their 4000 line scaling great).


Well my 3870x2 1gb card doesnt scale well on crysis, and crysis warhead.
Hope Far Cry 2 is different.
Ar.Pi Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Senior Member
12.10.2008 05:05
Quote: (Originally Posted by imstreet)
One question i have.

Will Far Cry 2 use more then 1 gpu?

Will it scale well on SLI\Crossfire\Multi-gpu cards?


I'm almost sure it will. Most games do.

The question is how well it will scale. And that depends on drivers also.

I know nvidia is working closely with developers so they have better SLI support for new games, but ATI is catching up (also their 4000 line scaling great).
imstreet Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Junior Member
12.10.2008 01:41
One question i have.

Will Far Cry 2 use more then 1 gpu?

Will it scale well on SLI\Crossfire\Multi-gpu cards?
pcghx_thilo Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Administrator
06.10.2008 17:39
Xbox 360 and PS3 are both multi-threaded
Yapa Re: Far Cry 2: Hardware nerds’ gaming experience
Member
05.10.2008 06:57
Well I dont see how they would be making use of those extra cores... I mean we are just seeing dual core games now on the pc, and yet to see a truly quad or even tri core game... so I dont see how console games would be multi-core (more than 2) as the same port of the game is only single or dual core on pc....

Besides, console games look a lot worse than their pc counterparts...

Copyright © 2009 by Computec Media AG      About/Imprint  •  Terms/Conditions